[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXv+5Fs+UtPgcjZXkhwBU=+HTv89o=xgk4cmsrFLB3FpQdNYw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 15:41:46 +0800
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Cc: mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
johnson.wang@...iatek.com, miles.chen@...iatek.com,
chun-jie.chen@...iatek.com, daniel@...rotopia.org,
fparent@...libre.com, msp@...libre.com, nfraprado@...labora.com,
rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com, zhaojh329@...il.com,
sam.shih@...iatek.com, edward-jw.yang@...iatek.com,
yangyingliang@...wei.com, granquet@...libre.com,
pablo.sun@...iatek.com, sean.wang@...iatek.com,
chen.zhong@...iatek.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 15/45] clk: mediatek: mt8167: Remove __initconst
annotation from arrays
On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 11:30 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> The clock arrays are not used only during init but also during
> runtime: drop the __initconst annotation.
This should be squashed into the next patch, as by itself this one doesn't
make sense. That or the commit message should worded as if this is preparing
the drivers for the subsequent conversion to proper platform drivers.
Code changes look OK.
ChenYu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists