linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 2/8] iommu: Introduce a new iommu_group_replace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 7 Feb 2023 08:22:37 -0400
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To:     "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
Cc:     Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>,
        "joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
        "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
        "robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
        "alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        "shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>,
        "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        "baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/8] iommu: Introduce a new
 iommu_group_replace_domain() API

On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 12:32:50AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
> > Sent: Monday, February 6, 2023 9:25 PM
> > 
> > On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 06:57:35AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > > > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
> > > > Sent: Friday, February 3, 2023 11:03 PM
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 08:26:44AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > > > > > From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2023 3:05 PM
> > > > > >
> > > > > > All drivers are already required to support changing between active
> > > > > > UNMANAGED domains when using their attach_dev ops.
> > > > >
> > > > > All drivers which don't have *broken* UNMANAGED domain?
> > > >
> > > > No, all drivers.. It has always been used by VFIO.
> > >
> > > existing iommu_attach_group() doesn't support changing between
> > > two UNMANAGED domains. only from default->unmanaged or
> > > blocking->unmanaged.
> > 
> > Yes, but before we added the blocking domains VFIO was changing
> > between unmanaged domains. Blocking domains are so new that no driver
> > could have suddenly started to depend on this.
> 
> In legacy VFIO unmanaged domain was 1:1 associated with vfio
> container. I didn't say how a group can switch between two
> containers w/o going through transition to/from the default
> domain, i.e. detach from 1st container and then attach to the 2nd.

Yes, in the past we went through the default domain which is basically
another unmanaged domain type. So unmanaged -> unmanaged is OK.

> > Inside the driver, it can keep track of the domain pointer if
> > attach_dev succeeds
> 
> Are you referring to no error unwinding in __iommu_group_for_each_dev()
> so if it is failed some devices may have attach_dev succeeds then simply
> recovering group->domain in __iommu_attach_group() is insufficient?

Yes

Jason