[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+JGh0+a540TLr6V@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 08:39:35 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LTP List <ltp@...ts.linux.it>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: LTP: preadv03: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 101250 at mm/gup.c:2121
is_valid_gup_args (mm/gup.c:2121 (discriminator 1))
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 02:09:27PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> Following test regressions noticed on Linux next-20230207.
> LTP syscalls pwritev03 and preadv03 failed.
> The tests use external mounted SSD drives for creating tmp files.
>
> Regressions found on arm64 juno-r2 and x86:
> - ltp-syscalls/pwritev03
> - ltp-syscalls/preadv03
> - ltp-syscalls/pwritev03_64
> - ltp-syscalls/preadv03_64
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
Yes, this is what Stephen noticed, it is a merge resolution problem
in linux-next
https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y+JBak3Tt8Pdw3yE@nvidia.com/
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists