linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] remoteproc: imx_dsp_rproc: add custom memory copy implementation for i.MX DSP Cores

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEnQRZBc2EWHWev_OCsiQKj2kYZZ2vmoBpJaLJX1nBpDN=AQEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 Feb 2023 15:11:37 +0200
From:   Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com>
To:     "Iuliana Prodan (OSS)" <iuliana.prodan@....nxp.com>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        "S.J. Wang" <shengjiu.wang@....com>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
        Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>,
        linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] remoteproc: imx_dsp_rproc: add custom memory copy
 implementation for i.MX DSP Cores

On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 5:28 PM Iuliana Prodan (OSS)
<iuliana.prodan@....nxp.com> wrote:
>
> From: Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>
>
> The IRAM is part of the HiFi DSP.
> According to hardware specification only 32-bits write are allowed
> otherwise we get a Kernel panic.
>
> Therefore add a custom memory copy and memset functions to deal with
> the above restriction.
>
> Signed-off-by: Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>

The reported-by shouldn't be here, as LKP only reported some warnings
to your original patch.

I think it is enough to credit it inside version history.