[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+JbKrbExeQ7uIvC@T590>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 22:07:38 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To: Ziyang Zhang <ZiyangZhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/3] ublk: mention WRITE_ZEROES in comment of
ublk_complete_rq()
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 03:08:38PM +0800, Ziyang Zhang wrote:
> WRITE_ZEROES won't return bytes returned just like FLUSH and DISCARD,
> and we can end it directly. Add missing comment for it in
> ublk_complete_rq().
>
> Signed-off-by: Ziyang Zhang <ZiyangZhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> index 55fccce68a9c..06eddefdf02a 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> @@ -665,7 +665,7 @@ static void ublk_complete_rq(struct request *req)
> }
>
> /*
> - * FLUSH or DISCARD usually won't return bytes returned, so end them
> + * FLUSH, DISCARD or WRITE_ZEROES usually won't return bytes returned, so end them
> * directly.
> *
> * Both the two needn't unmap.
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Thanks,
Ming
Powered by blists - more mailing lists