[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+JmdMJhPEGN0Zw+@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 10:55:48 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jhubbard@...dia.com, tjmercier@...gle.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
surenb@...gle.com, mkoutny@...e.com, daniel@...ll.ch,
"Daniel P . Berrange" <berrange@...hat.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
io-uring@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/19] io_uring: convert to use vm_account
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 07:28:56AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Outside of that, we're now doubling the amount of memory associated with
> tracking this. That isn't necessarily a showstopper, but it is not
> ideal. I didn't take a look at the other conversions (again, because
> they were not sent to me), but seems like the task_struct and flags
> could just be passed in as they may very well be known to many/most
> callers?
For places doing the mm accounting type it cannot use the task struct
as the underlying mm can be replaced and keep the task, IIRC.
We just had a bug in VFIO related to this..
If we could go back from the mm to the task (even a from a destroyed
mm though) that might work to reduce storage?
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists