[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+Pj+9bbBbHpf6xM@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 19:03:39 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Bharata B Rao <bharata@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, mgorman@...e.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
x86@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, luto@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, yue.li@...verge.com,
Ravikumar.Bangoria@....com, ying.huang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Memory access profiler(IBS) driven NUMA balancing
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 01:05:28PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> - Perf uses IBS and we are using the same IBS for access profiling here.
> There needs to be a proper way to make the use mutually exclusive.
No, IFF this lives it needs to use in-kernel perf.
> - Is tying this up with NUMA balancing a reasonable approach or
> should we look at a completely new approach?
Is it giving sufficient win to be worth it, afaict it doesn't come even
close to justifying it.
> - Hardware provided access information could be very useful for driving
> hot page promotion in tiered memory systems. Need to check if this
> requires different tuning/heuristics apart from what NUMA balancing
> already does.
I think Huang Ying looked at that from the Intel POV and I think the
conclusion was that it doesn't really work out. What you need is
frequency information, but the PMU doesn't really give you that. You
need to process a *ton* of PMU data in-kernel.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists