linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/24] Add basic ACPI support for RISC-V

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 8 Feb 2023 18:28:15 +0000
From:   Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To:     Sunil V L <sunilvl@...tanamicro.com>
Cc:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>,
        Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
        Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/24] Add basic ACPI support for RISC-V

Hey Sunil,

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:52:01PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote:
> This patch series enables the basic ACPI infrastructure for RISC-V.
> Supporting external interrupt controllers is in progress and hence it is
> tested using polling based HVC SBI console and RAM disk.
> 
> The series depends on Anup's IPI improvement series.
> https://github.com/avpatel/linux/commits/riscv_ipi_imp_v17

In the future, please provide links to patchsets rather than "random"
git trees.

> Jisheng Zhang (1):
>   riscv: move sbi_init() earlier before jump_label_init()
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

What has this patch got to do with your series? Just something that was
sitting in your tree?

If you need this, it'd be ideal if you would submit *with* the R-b tags
it appears to have had by v6 [1] & add the reason that you need to move
it to the commit message.
In Jisheng's series that was obvious, but this is a significantly larger
series and it is hard to spot your reasoning for it.

Cheers,
Conor.


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)