[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <68d10a9b27a0a3894a290b28c1a22085@walle.cc>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2023 16:28:45 +0100
From: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mtd: spi-nor: fix memory leak when using
debugfs_lookup()
> +static void __exit spi_nor_module_exit(void)
> +{
> + spi_nor_debugfs_shutdown();
> + spi_mem_driver_unregister(&spi_nor_driver);
Hm, does the order matter here? I didn't test it, but this will
lead to:
rootdir = debugfs_create_dir("spi-nor", NULL);
nor->debugfs_root = debugfs_create_dir("spi0", rootdir);
debugfs_remove(rootdir);
debugfs_remove(nor->debugfs_root);
If that's ok, then this looks good.
-michael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists