[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230208153407.4a5vnbctf77xf5vf@bogus>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 15:34:07 +0000
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Kazuki <kazukih0205@...il.com>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>,
Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: s2idle breaks on machines without cpuidle support
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 12:19:39AM +0900, Kazuki wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 03:03:06PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
[...]
> > Well, if we are allowing to boot on such a system, then we must allow
> > adding a platform specific idle driver. It may be useful once we info
> > to add deeper than WFI states.
>
> Hmmm, I thought for arm64, non-PSCI idle drivers were prohibited? Or am
> I mistaken here?
I don't know. I am not against it especially now that we have allowed a
non-PSCI based production system to boot the kernel.
> > Are we ? I thought were making changes to enable it. Or are you saying
> > we allow to enter into such a state and render the system unusable, if
> > so we need to fix it.
>
> Both as I mentioned in my first email. Apologies if it turned out to
> be confusing.
Sorry still confusing. Are you saying you can enter s2idle and crash or
hang the system without changes(especially around this s2idle code) ?
If yes, then it is a bug. If the hang/crash is only after your changes,
we need to check.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists