[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <757358.1675955219@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2023 15:06:59 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
syzbot+a440341a59e3b7142895@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 01/12] splice: Fix O_DIRECT file read splice to avoid reversion of ITER_PIPE
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 10:29:43AM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> > + npages = alloc_pages_bulk_list(GFP_USER, npages, &pages);
>
> Please don't use alloc_pages_bulk_list(). If nobody uses it, it can go
> away again soon. Does alloc_pages_bulk_array() work for you? It's
> faster.
Sure.
> > + /* Free any pages that didn't get touched at all. */
> > + for (; reclaim >= PAGE_SIZE; reclaim -= PAGE_SIZE)
> > + __free_page(bv[--npages].bv_page);
>
> If you have that array, you can then use release_pages() to free
> them, which will be faster.
Um. I would normally overlay the array on end of the bvec[] so that I could
save on an allocation (I have to fill in the bvec[] anyway) - which means I
wouldn't still have the array at release time. But in this case I can make an
exception, though I would've thought that the expectation would be that all
the requested data would be fetched.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists