[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+UVTFseqHLhxRXR@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2023 08:46:20 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@...gnu.org, "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dov Murik <dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
Daniel P . Berrangé <berrange@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@...aro.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@...aro.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/7] revert RNG seed mess
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 04:12:23PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> All attempts to fix up passing RNG seed via setup_data entry failed.
> Let's just rip out all of it. We'll start over.
>
>
> Warning: all I did was git revert the relevant patches and resolve the
> (trivial) conflicts. Not even compiled - it's almost midnight here.
>
> Jason this is the kind of approach I'd like to see, not yet another
> pointer math rich patch I need to spend time reviewing. Just get us back
> to where we started. We can redo "x86: use typedef for SetupData struct"
> later if we want, it's benign.
>
> Could you do something like this pls?
> Or test and ack if this patchset happens to work by luck.
>
> Michael S. Tsirkin (7):
> Revert "x86: don't let decompressed kernel image clobber setup_data"
> Revert "x86: do not re-randomize RNG seed on snapshot load"
> Revert "x86: re-initialize RNG seed when selecting kernel"
> Revert "x86: reinitialize RNG seed on system reboot"
> Revert "x86: use typedef for SetupData struct"
> Revert "x86: return modified setup_data only if read as memory, not as
> file"
> Revert "hw/i386: pass RNG seed via setup_data entry"
>
> include/hw/i386/microvm.h | 5 +-
> include/hw/i386/pc.h | 3 -
> include/hw/i386/x86.h | 3 +-
> include/hw/nvram/fw_cfg.h | 31 ----------
> hw/i386/microvm.c | 17 ++----
> hw/i386/pc.c | 4 +-
> hw/i386/pc_piix.c | 2 -
> hw/i386/pc_q35.c | 2 -
> hw/i386/x86.c | 122 ++++++++++----------------------------
> hw/nvram/fw_cfg.c | 21 ++-----
> 10 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 161 deletions(-)
>
> --
> MST
>
For the record, all three of the cases that I tested (i386 no EFI,
x86_64 with and without EFI) worked fine with this series. In case it is
useful:
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cheers,
Nathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists