[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB5276859C11057878722F30988CD99@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2023 02:55:24 +0000
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>,
"jgg@...dia.com" <jgg@...dia.com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>
CC: "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 02/10] iommu: Introduce a new
iommu_group_replace_domain() API
> From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2023 5:18 AM
>
> +int iommu_group_replace_domain(struct iommu_group *group,
> + struct iommu_domain *new_domain)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!new_domain)
> + return -EINVAL;
Is there value of allowing NULL new domain so this plays like
iommu_detach_group() then iommufd only needs call one
function in both attach/detach path?
> +
> + mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
> + ret = __iommu_group_set_domain(group, new_domain);
> + if (ret)
> + __iommu_group_set_domain(group, group->domain);
> + mutex_unlock(&group->mutex);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iommu_group_replace_domain,
> IOMMUFD_INTERNAL);
> +
> static int iommu_group_do_set_platform_dma(struct device *dev, void
> *data)
> {
> const struct iommu_ops *ops = dev_iommu_ops(dev);
> --
> 2.39.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists