[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230209181148.GA575482-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2023 12:11:48 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>, airlied@...il.com,
tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
steven.price@....com, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
alyssa.rosenzweig@...labora.com, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
matthias.bgg@...il.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] dt-bindings: gpu: mali-bifrost: Don't allow
sram-supply by default
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 10:15:33AM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 09/02/23 03:50, Chen-Yu Tsai ha scritto:
> > On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 6:37 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> > <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > The sram-supply is MediaTek-specific, it is and will ever be used
> > > only for the mediatek,mt8183-mali compatible due to the addition of
> > > the mediatek-regulator-coupler driver: change the binding to add
> > > this supply when mediatek,mt8183-mali is present as a compatible
> > > instead of disabling it when not present.
> > >
> > > This is done in preparation for adding new bindings for other
> > > MediaTek SoCs, such as MT8192 and others.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
> > > ---
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml | 4 +---
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml
> > > index 78964c140b46..69212f3b1328 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml
> > > @@ -57,8 +57,6 @@ properties:
> > >
> > > mali-supply: true
> > >
> > > - sram-supply: true
> > > -
> >
> > Have you tried actually validating the device trees against this?
> > Based on my previous tests this gives out errors.
>
> I did... and I didn't get any complaint... but perhaps something went wrong
> on my side?
>
> I mean, I can retry just to be sure.
You should need unevaluatedProperties instead of additionalProperties
for this to work. The latter cannot 'see' into an if/then schema.
But really we want the default top level to allow this and then disallow
it in an if/then schema.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists