lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9b6bca9c-7189-a2d5-8c0a-f55c24f54b62@bytedance.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Feb 2023 20:32:02 +0000
From:   Usama Arif <usama.arif@...edance.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, dwmw2@...radead.org,
        kim.phillips@....com
Cc:     arjan@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org,
        pbonzini@...hat.com, paulmck@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        rcu@...r.kernel.org, mimoja@...oja.de, hewenliang4@...wei.com,
        thomas.lendacky@....com, seanjc@...gle.com, pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de,
        fam.zheng@...edance.com, punit.agrawal@...edance.com,
        simon.evans@...edance.com, liangma@...ngbit.com,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v8 8/9] x86/mtrr: Avoid repeated save of
 MTRRs on boot-time CPU bringup



On 09/02/2023 18:31, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09 2023 at 15:41, Usama Arif wrote:
>>   void mtrr_save_state(void)
>>   {
>> +	static bool mtrr_saved;
>>   	int first_cpu;
>>   
>>   	if (!mtrr_enabled())
>>   		return;
>>   
>> +	if (system_state < SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
>> +		if (!mtrr_saved) {
>> +			mtrr_save_fixed_ranges(NULL);
>> +			mtrr_saved = true;
>> +		}
>> +		return;
>> +	}
>> +
>>   	first_cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
>>   	smp_call_function_single(first_cpu, mtrr_save_fixed_ranges, NULL, 1);
> 
> So why is this relevant after the initial bringup? The BP MTRRs have
> been saved already above, no?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>          tglx

I will let David confirm if this is correct and why he did it, but this 
is what I thought while reviewing before posting v4:

- At initial boot (system_state < SYSTEM_RUNNING), when mtrr_save_state 
is called in do_cpu_up at roughly the same time so MTRR is going to be 
the same, we can just save it once and then reuse for other secondary 
cores as it wouldn't have changed for the rest of the do_cpu_up calls.

- When the system is running and you offline and then online a CPU, you 
want to make sure that hotplugged CPU gets the current MTRR (which might 
have changed since boot?), incase the MTRR has changed after the system 
has been booted, you save the MTRR of the first online CPU. When the 
hotplugged CPU runs its initialisation code, its fixed-range MTRRs will 
be updated with the newly saved fixed-range MTRRs.

So mainly for hotplug, but will let David confirm.

Thanks,
Usama

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ