[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87lel61k3h.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2023 23:42:59 +0000
From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
To: Sameer Pujar <spujar@...dia.com>
Cc: <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
<thierry.reding@...il.com>, <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
<oder_chiou@...ltek.com>, <broonie@...nel.org>, <perex@...ex.cz>,
<tiwai@...e.com>, <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: rt5640: Update MCLK rate in set_sysclk()
Hi Sameer
> Simple-card/audio-graph-card drivers do not handle MCLK clock when it
> is specified in the codec device node. The expectation here is that,
> the codec should actually own up the MCLK clock and do necessary setup
> in the driver.
I have no objection about this patch, but have interesting about this comment.
Simple-card/audio-graph-card both are using asoc_simple_hw_params,
and it calls clk_set_rate() for Codec/CPU if it has mclk.
But am I misunderstanding ?
If it was simple-card-utils side miss, I'm happy to fix it.
Thank you for your help !!
Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto
Powered by blists - more mailing lists