linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] kasan: fix deadlock in start

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 9 Feb 2023 09:55:39 +0100
From:   Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
To:     Weizhao Ouyang <ouyangweizhao@...u.com>
Cc:     Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
        Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Weizhao Ouyang <o451686892@...il.com>,
        Shuai Yuan <yuanshuai@...u.com>, Peng Ren <renlipeng@...u.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kasan: fix deadlock in start_report()

On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 at 04:27, Weizhao Ouyang <ouyangweizhao@...u.com> wrote:
>
> From: Weizhao Ouyang <o451686892@...il.com>
>
> From: Shuai Yuan <yuanshuai@...u.com>
>
> Calling start_report() again between start_report() and end_report()
> will result in a race issue for the report_lock. In extreme cases this
> problem arose in Kunit tests in the hardware tag-based Kasan mode.
>
> For example, when an invalid memory release problem is found,
> kasan_report_invalid_free() will print error log, but if an MTE exception
> is raised during the output log, the kasan_report() is called, resulting
> in a deadlock problem. The kasan_depth not protect it in hardware
> tag-based Kasan mode.

I think checking report_suppressed() would be cleaner and simpler than
ignoring all trylock failures. If trylock fails, it does not mean that
the current thread is holding it. We of course could do a custom lock
which stores current->tid in the lock word, but it looks effectively
equivalent to checking report_suppressed().



> Signed-off-by: Shuai Yuan <yuanshuai@...u.com>
> Reviewed-by: Weizhao Ouyang <ouyangweizhao@...u.com>
> Reviewed-by: Peng Ren <renlipeng@...u.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> -- remove redundant log
>
>  mm/kasan/report.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/kasan/report.c b/mm/kasan/report.c
> index 22598b20c7b7..aa39aa8b1855 100644
> --- a/mm/kasan/report.c
> +++ b/mm/kasan/report.c
> @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static inline void fail_non_kasan_kunit_test(void) { }
>
>  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(report_lock);
>
> -static void start_report(unsigned long *flags, bool sync)
> +static bool start_report(unsigned long *flags, bool sync)
>  {
>         fail_non_kasan_kunit_test();
>         /* Respect the /proc/sys/kernel/traceoff_on_warning interface. */
> @@ -175,8 +175,13 @@ static void start_report(unsigned long *flags, bool sync)
>         lockdep_off();
>         /* Make sure we don't end up in loop. */
>         kasan_disable_current();
> -       spin_lock_irqsave(&report_lock, *flags);
> +       if (!spin_trylock_irqsave(&report_lock, *flags)) {
> +               lockdep_on();
> +               kasan_enable_current();
> +               return false;
> +       }
>         pr_err("==================================================================\n");
> +       return true;
>  }
>
>  static void end_report(unsigned long *flags, void *addr)
> @@ -468,7 +473,10 @@ void kasan_report_invalid_free(void *ptr, unsigned long ip, enum kasan_report_ty
>         if (unlikely(!report_enabled()))
>                 return;
>
> -       start_report(&flags, true);
> +       if (!start_report(&flags, true)) {
> +               pr_err("%s: report ignore\n", __func__);
> +               return;
> +       }
>
>         memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info));
>         info.type = type;
> @@ -503,7 +511,11 @@ bool kasan_report(unsigned long addr, size_t size, bool is_write,
>                 goto out;
>         }
>
> -       start_report(&irq_flags, true);
> +       if (!start_report(&irq_flags, true)) {
> +               ret = false;
> +               pr_err("%s: report ignore\n", __func__);
> +               goto out;
> +       }
>
>         memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info));
>         info.type = KASAN_REPORT_ACCESS;
> @@ -536,7 +548,10 @@ void kasan_report_async(void)
>         if (unlikely(!report_enabled()))
>                 return;
>
> -       start_report(&flags, false);
> +       if (!start_report(&flags, false)) {
> +               pr_err("%s: report ignore\n", __func__);
> +               return;
> +       }
>         pr_err("BUG: KASAN: invalid-access\n");
>         pr_err("Asynchronous fault: no details available\n");
>         pr_err("\n");
> --
> 2.25.1
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "kasan-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kasan-dev+unsubscribe@...glegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kasan-dev/20230209031159.2337445-1-ouyangweizhao%40zeku.com.