[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7784f5a2-3cfc-9999-0ad6-cb9cfc1f2822@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2023 10:20:45 +0100
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
Cc: airlied@...il.com, tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, steven.price@....com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
alyssa.rosenzweig@...labora.com, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
matthias.bgg@...il.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Fei Shao <fshao@...omium.org>, Nick Fan <Nick.Fan@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] dt-bindings: gpu: mali-bifrost: Add a compatible for
MediaTek MT8186
Il 09/02/23 09:49, Chen-Yu Tsai ha scritto:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 6:37 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com> wrote:
>>
>> Get GPU support on MT8186 by adding its compatible.
>
> I'd skip MT8186 for now. We have to work out some binning details for the
> OPP, in particular how to deal with both Panfrost (or Mali) and SVS adding
> the OPP table. We were just looking at the Mali driver today.
>
Dealing with binning is fairly easy... I have something already done for
that one, but I'm not sure that it would be the best option.
My solution makes use of opp-supported-hw by "standard means", but perhaps
let's have a separated conversation about it?
I don't think that skipping this would give any benefit though, because
that is only adding a compatible and whatever binning support would have
to be generic and 99% not bound to any mediatek specific compatible.
Angelo
> ChenYu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists