[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4377e0bc-5954-c0c3-0daa-24a4427c144e@bytedance.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2023 10:19:38 +0000
From: Usama Arif <usama.arif@...edance.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, paulmck@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: kim.phillips@....com, arjan@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com,
x86@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org, mimoja@...oja.de,
hewenliang4@...wei.com, thomas.lendacky@....com, seanjc@...gle.com,
pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de, fam.zheng@...edance.com,
punit.agrawal@...edance.com, simon.evans@...edance.com,
liangma@...ngbit.com
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] Parallel CPU bringup for x86_64
On 09/02/2023 10:06, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-02-09 at 09:49 +0000, Usama Arif wrote:
>>
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
>> @@ -1080,6 +1080,7 @@ wakeup_cpu_via_init_nmi(int cpu, unsigned long
>> start_ip, int apicid,
>> wakeup_cpu0_nmi, 0, "wake_cpu0");
>>
>> if (!boot_error) {
>> + initial_gs = per_cpu_offset(cpu);
>
> That's for 64-bit.
>
>> enable_start_cpu0 = 1;
>> *cpu0_nmi_registered = 1;
>> id = apic->dest_mode_logical ? cpu0_logical_apicid :
>> apicid;
>> @@ -1188,10 +1189,14 @@ static int do_boot_cpu(int apicid, int cpu,
>> struct task_struct *idle,
>> boot_error = apic->wakeup_secondary_cpu_64(apicid,
>> start_ip);
>> else if (apic->wakeup_secondary_cpu)
>> boot_error = apic->wakeup_secondary_cpu(apicid, start_ip);
>> - else
>> + else {
>> + if(!cpu) {
>> + early_gdt_descr.address = (unsigned long)get_cpu_gdt_rw(cpu);
>> + initial_stack = idle->thread.sp;
>> + }
>
> And that's 32-bit.
>
> These were previously done in common_cpu_up() or do_boot_cpu(), which
> means they were done not only for the wakeup_cpu_via_init_nmi() code
> path, but also when we call apic->wakeup_secondary_cpu() (or _64()) for
> the esoteric UV/NumaConnect machines.
>
> Thanks for diagnosing it so quickly; I'll work up a subtly different
> fix.
>
Yeah, was just a hacky fix while I was trying to figure out the issue.
do_boot_cpu is only called in cpu0 in hotplug case, so I think this a
much better diff:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index 3ec5182d9698..f7ae82969ee4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -1136,13 +1136,16 @@ static int do_boot_cpu(int apicid, int cpu,
struct task_struct *idle,
idle->thread.sp = (unsigned long)task_pt_regs(idle);
initial_code = (unsigned long)start_secondary;
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_32)) {
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_32) || !cpu) {
early_gdt_descr.address = (unsigned
long)get_cpu_gdt_rw(cpu);
initial_stack = idle->thread.sp;
} else if (!do_parallel_bringup) {
smpboot_control = STARTUP_SECONDARY | apicid;
}
+ if (!cpu)
+ initial_gs = per_cpu_offset(cpu);
+
/* Enable the espfix hack for this CPU */
init_espfix_ap(cpu);
>> boot_error = wakeup_cpu_via_init_nmi(cpu, start_ip, apicid,
>> cpu0_nmi_registered);
>> -
>> + }
>> return boot_error;
>> }
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists