linux-kernel - Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] Parallel CPU bringup for x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 09 Feb 2023 12:53:14 +0100
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Usama Arif <usama.arif@...edance.com>, paulmck@...nel.org
Cc:     kim.phillips@....com, arjan@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...hat.com,
        bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com,
        x86@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org, mimoja@...oja.de,
        hewenliang4@...wei.com, thomas.lendacky@....com, seanjc@...gle.com,
        pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de, fam.zheng@...edance.com,
        punit.agrawal@...edance.com, simon.evans@...edance.com,
        liangma@...ngbit.com
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] Parallel CPU bringup for x86_64

On Thu, Feb 09 2023 at 11:03, David Woodhouse wrote:
> This one also fixes it for me. If we're happy with this approach, I'll
> work it into Thomas's original patch (and hopefully eventually he'll be
> happy enough with it and the commit message that he'll give us his
> Signed-off-by for it.)

I'm happy enough by now, but I'm not sure how much of the original patch
is still left. Also you did the heavy lifting of making it work and
writing the nice changelog. So please make this:

From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>

Co-developed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>

> I could probably add a Co-developed-by: tglx for that first x2apic
> patch in the series too, but then it would *also* need his SoB and I
> didn't want to be owed two, so I just pasted his suggested code and
> didn't credit him.

That's what Suggested-by: is for. For that I don't owe you anything. :)

Thanks

        tglx