| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <87mt5n6kx6.fsf@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2023 14:13:57 +0100
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: VMX: Stub out enable_evmcs static key for
CONFIG_HYPERV=n
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> writes:
> Wrap enable_evmcs in a helper and stub it out when CONFIG_HYPERV=n in
> order to eliminate the static branch nop placeholders. clang-14 is clever
> enough to elide the nop, but gcc-12 is not. Stubbing out the key reduces
> the size of kvm-intel.ko by ~7.5% (200KiB) when compiled with gcc-12
> (there are a _lot_ of VMCS accesses throughout KVM).
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/hyperv.c | 4 ++--
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/hyperv.h | 10 ++++++++--
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 15 +++++++--------
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx_ops.h | 22 +++++++++++-----------
> 4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/hyperv.c
> index b6748055c586..274fbd38c64e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/hyperv.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/hyperv.c
> @@ -118,8 +118,6 @@
>
> #define EVMCS1_SUPPORTED_VMFUNC (0)
>
> -DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(enable_evmcs);
> -
> #define EVMCS1_OFFSET(x) offsetof(struct hv_enlightened_vmcs, x)
> #define EVMCS1_FIELD(number, name, clean_field)[ROL16(number, 6)] = \
> {EVMCS1_OFFSET(name), clean_field}
> @@ -611,6 +609,8 @@ int nested_evmcs_check_controls(struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
> }
>
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV)
> +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(enable_evmcs);
> +
> /*
> * KVM on Hyper-V always uses the latest known eVMCSv1 revision, the assumption
> * is: in case a feature has corresponding fields in eVMCS described and it was
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/hyperv.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/hyperv.h
> index 1299143d00df..a0b6d05dba5d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/hyperv.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/hyperv.h
> @@ -16,8 +16,6 @@
>
> struct vmcs_config;
>
> -DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(enable_evmcs);
> -
> #define current_evmcs ((struct hv_enlightened_vmcs *)this_cpu_read(current_vmcs))
>
> #define KVM_EVMCS_VERSION 1
> @@ -69,6 +67,13 @@ static inline u64 evmcs_read_any(struct hv_enlightened_vmcs *evmcs,
>
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV)
>
> +DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(enable_evmcs);
> +
> +static __always_inline bool is_evmcs_enabled(void)
> +{
> + return static_branch_unlikely(&enable_evmcs);
> +}
I have a suggestion. While 'is_evmcs_enabled' name is certainly not
worse than 'enable_evmcs', it may still be confusing as it's not clear
which eVMCS is meant: are we running a guest using eVMCS or using eVMCS
ourselves? So what if we rename this to a very explicit 'is_kvm_on_hyperv()'
and hide the implementation details (i.e. 'evmcs') inside?
> +
> static __always_inline int get_evmcs_offset(unsigned long field,
> u16 *clean_field)
> {
> @@ -158,6 +163,7 @@ static inline void evmcs_load(u64 phys_addr)
>
> void evmcs_sanitize_exec_ctrls(struct vmcs_config *vmcs_conf);
> #else /* !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV) */
> +static __always_inline bool is_evmcs_enabled(void) { return false; }
> static __always_inline void evmcs_write64(unsigned long field, u64 value) {}
> static __always_inline void evmcs_write32(unsigned long field, u32 value) {}
> static __always_inline void evmcs_write16(unsigned long field, u16 value) {}
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index 33614ee2cd67..9f0098c9ad64 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ static void hv_reset_evmcs(void)
> {
> struct hv_vp_assist_page *vp_ap;
>
> - if (!static_branch_unlikely(&enable_evmcs))
> + if (!is_evmcs_enabled())
> return;
>
> /*
> @@ -2818,8 +2818,7 @@ static int vmx_hardware_enable(void)
> * This can happen if we hot-added a CPU but failed to allocate
> * VP assist page for it.
> */
> - if (static_branch_unlikely(&enable_evmcs) &&
> - !hv_get_vp_assist_page(cpu))
> + if (is_evmcs_enabled() && !hv_get_vp_assist_page(cpu))
> return -EFAULT;
>
> intel_pt_handle_vmx(1);
> @@ -2871,7 +2870,7 @@ struct vmcs *alloc_vmcs_cpu(bool shadow, int cpu, gfp_t flags)
> memset(vmcs, 0, vmcs_config.size);
>
> /* KVM supports Enlightened VMCS v1 only */
> - if (static_branch_unlikely(&enable_evmcs))
> + if (is_evmcs_enabled())
> vmcs->hdr.revision_id = KVM_EVMCS_VERSION;
> else
> vmcs->hdr.revision_id = vmcs_config.revision_id;
> @@ -2966,7 +2965,7 @@ static __init int alloc_kvm_area(void)
> * still be marked with revision_id reported by
> * physical CPU.
> */
> - if (static_branch_unlikely(&enable_evmcs))
> + if (is_evmcs_enabled())
> vmcs->hdr.revision_id = vmcs_config.revision_id;
>
> per_cpu(vmxarea, cpu) = vmcs;
> @@ -3936,7 +3935,7 @@ static void vmx_msr_bitmap_l01_changed(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
> * 'Enlightened MSR Bitmap' feature L0 needs to know that MSR
> * bitmap has changed.
> */
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV) && static_branch_unlikely(&enable_evmcs)) {
> + if (is_evmcs_enabled()) {
> struct hv_enlightened_vmcs *evmcs = (void *)vmx->vmcs01.vmcs;
>
> if (evmcs->hv_enlightenments_control.msr_bitmap)
> @@ -7313,7 +7312,7 @@ static fastpath_t vmx_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> vmx_vcpu_enter_exit(vcpu, __vmx_vcpu_run_flags(vmx));
>
> /* All fields are clean at this point */
> - if (static_branch_unlikely(&enable_evmcs)) {
> + if (is_evmcs_enabled()) {
> current_evmcs->hv_clean_fields |=
> HV_VMX_ENLIGHTENED_CLEAN_FIELD_ALL;
>
> @@ -7443,7 +7442,7 @@ static int vmx_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> * feature only for vmcs01, KVM currently isn't equipped to realize any
> * performance benefits from enabling it for vmcs02.
> */
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV) && static_branch_unlikely(&enable_evmcs) &&
> + if (is_evmcs_enabled() &&
> (ms_hyperv.nested_features & HV_X64_NESTED_MSR_BITMAP)) {
> struct hv_enlightened_vmcs *evmcs = (void *)vmx->vmcs01.vmcs;
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx_ops.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx_ops.h
> index db95bde52998..6b072db47fdc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx_ops.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx_ops.h
> @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static __always_inline unsigned long __vmcs_readl(unsigned long field)
> static __always_inline u16 vmcs_read16(unsigned long field)
> {
> vmcs_check16(field);
> - if (static_branch_unlikely(&enable_evmcs))
> + if (is_evmcs_enabled())
> return evmcs_read16(field);
> return __vmcs_readl(field);
> }
> @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ static __always_inline u16 vmcs_read16(unsigned long field)
> static __always_inline u32 vmcs_read32(unsigned long field)
> {
> vmcs_check32(field);
> - if (static_branch_unlikely(&enable_evmcs))
> + if (is_evmcs_enabled())
> return evmcs_read32(field);
> return __vmcs_readl(field);
> }
> @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ static __always_inline u32 vmcs_read32(unsigned long field)
> static __always_inline u64 vmcs_read64(unsigned long field)
> {
> vmcs_check64(field);
> - if (static_branch_unlikely(&enable_evmcs))
> + if (is_evmcs_enabled())
> return evmcs_read64(field);
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> return __vmcs_readl(field);
> @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static __always_inline u64 vmcs_read64(unsigned long field)
> static __always_inline unsigned long vmcs_readl(unsigned long field)
> {
> vmcs_checkl(field);
> - if (static_branch_unlikely(&enable_evmcs))
> + if (is_evmcs_enabled())
> return evmcs_read64(field);
> return __vmcs_readl(field);
> }
> @@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static __always_inline void __vmcs_writel(unsigned long field, unsigned long val
> static __always_inline void vmcs_write16(unsigned long field, u16 value)
> {
> vmcs_check16(field);
> - if (static_branch_unlikely(&enable_evmcs))
> + if (is_evmcs_enabled())
> return evmcs_write16(field, value);
>
> __vmcs_writel(field, value);
> @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ static __always_inline void vmcs_write16(unsigned long field, u16 value)
> static __always_inline void vmcs_write32(unsigned long field, u32 value)
> {
> vmcs_check32(field);
> - if (static_branch_unlikely(&enable_evmcs))
> + if (is_evmcs_enabled())
> return evmcs_write32(field, value);
>
> __vmcs_writel(field, value);
> @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static __always_inline void vmcs_write32(unsigned long field, u32 value)
> static __always_inline void vmcs_write64(unsigned long field, u64 value)
> {
> vmcs_check64(field);
> - if (static_branch_unlikely(&enable_evmcs))
> + if (is_evmcs_enabled())
> return evmcs_write64(field, value);
>
> __vmcs_writel(field, value);
> @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ static __always_inline void vmcs_write64(unsigned long field, u64 value)
> static __always_inline void vmcs_writel(unsigned long field, unsigned long value)
> {
> vmcs_checkl(field);
> - if (static_branch_unlikely(&enable_evmcs))
> + if (is_evmcs_enabled())
> return evmcs_write64(field, value);
>
> __vmcs_writel(field, value);
> @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ static __always_inline void vmcs_clear_bits(unsigned long field, u32 mask)
> {
> BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(__builtin_constant_p(field) && ((field) & 0x6000) == 0x2000,
> "vmcs_clear_bits does not support 64-bit fields");
> - if (static_branch_unlikely(&enable_evmcs))
> + if (is_evmcs_enabled())
> return evmcs_write32(field, evmcs_read32(field) & ~mask);
>
> __vmcs_writel(field, __vmcs_readl(field) & ~mask);
> @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static __always_inline void vmcs_set_bits(unsigned long field, u32 mask)
> {
> BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(__builtin_constant_p(field) && ((field) & 0x6000) == 0x2000,
> "vmcs_set_bits does not support 64-bit fields");
> - if (static_branch_unlikely(&enable_evmcs))
> + if (is_evmcs_enabled())
> return evmcs_write32(field, evmcs_read32(field) | mask);
>
> __vmcs_writel(field, __vmcs_readl(field) | mask);
> @@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ static inline void vmcs_load(struct vmcs *vmcs)
> {
> u64 phys_addr = __pa(vmcs);
>
> - if (static_branch_unlikely(&enable_evmcs))
> + if (is_evmcs_enabled())
> return evmcs_load(phys_addr);
>
> vmx_asm1(vmptrld, "m"(phys_addr), vmcs, phys_addr);
With or without the change:
Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
--
Vitaly
Powered by blists - more mailing lists