[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+Tzt0p+hDz0QMfH@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2023 09:23:03 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
Cc: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] iommu: Introduce a new
iommu_group_replace_domain() API
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 02:55:24AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2023 5:18 AM
> >
> > +int iommu_group_replace_domain(struct iommu_group *group,
> > + struct iommu_domain *new_domain)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (!new_domain)
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> Is there value of allowing NULL new domain so this plays like
> iommu_detach_group() then iommufd only needs call one
> function in both attach/detach path?
We've used NULL to mean the 'platform domain' in the iommu core code
in a few places, I'd prefer to avoid overloading NULL.
IMHO it doesn't help iommufd to substitute detach with replace.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists