[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+UDq2DYJJSA3L60@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2023 16:31:07 +0200
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kuan-Ying Lee <Kuan-Ying.Lee@...iatek.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
chinwen.chang@...iatek.com, andrew.yang@...iatek.com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/doc: Replace isolate_lru_page with folio_isolate_lru
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 01:58:09PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 03:10:07PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 11:02:11AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > > Kuan-Ying Lee <Kuan-Ying.Lee@...iatek.com> writes:
> > >
> > > > Since we introduce folio, replace isolate_lru_page() with
> > > > folio_isolate_lru().
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Kuan-Ying Lee <Kuan-Ying.Lee@...iatek.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > Documentation/mm/page_migration.rst | 6 +++---
> > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > This seems like a good patch to copy to linux-mm - done now.
> > >
> > > The patch perhaps is a closer match to what's in linux-next, but it
> > > seems that, if we're going to update this document, we should reflect
> > > the use folios throughout?
> >
> > Most of the current users of migrate_pages() still use isolate_lru_page()
> > so I think that updating page_migration.rst to folios is premature.
> > But when we do the update it also should include the translations.
>
> It's a slim majority -- 9 of isolate_lru_pages() and 7 of
> folio_isolate_lru(). I don't think that changing the documentation is
> premature; we should document the functions we want people to use.
> I'd be surprised if isolate_lru_pages() still existed in six months.
That's a bit of a problem when documentation describes how things are done
rather than how to do them, but I don't have a strong feeling about
updating the docs while we are still in the transition period or postponing
it until e.g. isolate_lru_page() is gone.
But in any case, this should be much more comprehensive update rather than
replacing two occurrences out of three in a single file.
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists