linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the rcu tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 10 Feb 2023 08:18:47 +0100
From:   Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the rcu
 tree

On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 12:48:18PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the driver-core tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/base/core.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   dc7c31b07ade ("drivers/base: Remove CONFIG_SRCU")
> 
> from the rcu tree and commit:
> 
>   3a2dbc510c43 ("driver core: fw_devlink: Don't purge child fwnode's consumer links")
> 
> from the driver-core tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Fix looks good to me, thanks!

greg k-h