linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add NVIDIA BlueField-3 GPIO driver and pin controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y+YdJdkToTAcvCDt@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 10 Feb 2023 12:32:05 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Asmaa Mnebhi <asmaa@...dia.com>
Cc:     "linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "bgolaszewski@...libre.com" <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add NVIDIA BlueField-3 GPIO driver and pin
 controller

On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 12:15:15PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 12:48 AM Asmaa Mnebhi <asmaa@...dia.com> wrote:
> 
> First of all, do not top-post!
> 
> > Thank you for your response. I was just going to contact you regarding this. I successfully sent these patches to you, Linus and Bartosz while they failed to get delivered to the "*.kernel.org" emails below:
> > linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org;
> > linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> > linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
> >
> > Have these emails changed?
> 
> No, but you need to work with your company's IT to understand what's
> going on. Your mails are only available privately and not in the
> archives on lore.kernel.org. This is an issue and I'm not going to
> comment on something that was not in public.

To illustrate what I'm talking about:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/CACRpkdZ_sPCa+Q6MWUKj1ytCe5AxTp--bMmbRTUfsNO0kZTMpQ@mail.gmail.com/T/#t


> > These patches don't have much in common with gpio-mlxbf or gpio-mlxbf2 because the hardware registers and logic have changed across generations. The only similar code between gpio-mlxbf2.c and gpio-mlxbf3.c is the irq handling.
> 
> I see, don't forget to put it in the cover letter for the next version
> (you will send it when you will be sure that emails are going to the
> kernel.org archives).

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko