[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMhs-H_NBtZV4kJtyMwkPqd1gZ1nQLRH1fbf7gqeJa13tOB5PQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 12:38:38 +0100
From: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, wim@...ux-watchdog.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
arinc.unal@...nc9.com, tsbogend@...ha.franken.de,
p.zabel@...gutronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: watchdog: mt7621-wdt: add phandle to
access system controller registers
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 12:27 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 10/02/2023 12:22, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 11:59 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10/02/2023 07:56, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> >>> MT7621 SoC provides a system controller node for accessing to some registers.
> >>> Add a phandle to this node to avoid using MIPS related arch operations and
> >>
> >> I don't understand this part. You claim you add a phandle to this node,
> >> but your binding suggest you add here a phandle to other node.
> >
> > Probably my English is not the best here :-). Yes, you are right, I
> > just want to add a phandle to the 'sysc' node in the current node.
>
> Then why do you need syscon compatible here?
Clear now. Will drop that in v2.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Thanks,
Sergio Paracuellos
Powered by blists - more mailing lists