lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 10 Feb 2023 14:03:26 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>,
        linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     wim@...ux-watchdog.org, linux@...ck-us.net, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
        arinc.unal@...nc9.com, tsbogend@...ha.franken.de,
        p.zabel@...gutronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: watchdog: mt7621-wdt: add phandle to
 access system controller registers

On 10/02/2023 13:17, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> MT7621 SoC provides a system controller node for accessing to some registers.
> Add a phandle in this node to avoid using MIPS related arch operations and
> includes in watchdog driver code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mediatek,mt7621-wdt.yaml  | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mediatek,mt7621-wdt.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mediatek,mt7621-wdt.yaml
> index b2b17fdf4..cc701e920 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mediatek,mt7621-wdt.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mediatek,mt7621-wdt.yaml
> @@ -19,6 +19,12 @@ properties:
>    reg:
>      maxItems: 1
>  
> +  ralink,sysctl:

Thanks for the changes. I did not notice it before - isn't Ralink part
of Mediatek now? Also compatible is mediatek, not "ralink"?



Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ