linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 1/5] pinctrl: at91: use devm_kasprintf() to avoid potential leaks (part 2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230210145656.71838-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 10 Feb 2023 16:56:52 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/5] pinctrl: at91: use devm_kasprintf() to avoid potential leaks (part 2)

Use devm_kasprintf() instead of kasprintf() to avoid any potential
leaks. At the moment drivers have no remove functionality hence
there is no need for fixes tag.

While at it, switch to use devm_kasprintf_strarray().

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
index 735c501e7a06..bb93d8bcfd08 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
 #include <linux/pm.h>
 #include <linux/seq_file.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/string_helpers.h>
 
 /* Since we request GPIOs from ourself */
 #include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
@@ -1371,6 +1372,7 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
 
 static int at91_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct at91_pinctrl *info;
 	struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pdesc;
 	int ret, i, j, k;
@@ -1394,9 +1396,19 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	for (i = 0, k = 0; i < gpio_banks; i++) {
+		char **pin_names;
+
+		pin_names = devm_kasprintf_strarray(dev, "pio", MAX_NB_GPIO_PER_BANK);
+		if (!names)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+
 		for (j = 0; j < MAX_NB_GPIO_PER_BANK; j++, k++) {
+			char *pin_name = pin_names[j];
+
+			strreplace(pin_name, '-', i + 'A');
+
 			pdesc->number = k;
-			pdesc->name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "pio%c%d", i + 'A', j);
+			pdesc->name = pin_name;
 			pdesc++;
 		}
 	}
@@ -1797,7 +1809,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id at91_gpio_of_match[] = {
 
 static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
-	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
 	struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_chip = NULL;
 	struct gpio_chip *chip;
 	struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range;
@@ -1866,16 +1879,14 @@ static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			chip->ngpio = ngpio;
 	}
 
-	names = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, chip->ngpio, sizeof(char *),
-			     GFP_KERNEL);
-
+	names = devm_kasprintf_strarray(dev, "pio", chip->ngpio);
 	if (!names) {
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
 		goto clk_enable_err;
 	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < chip->ngpio; i++)
-		names[i] = devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "pio%c%d", alias_idx + 'A', i);
+		strreplace('-', alias_idx + 'A');
 
 	chip->names = (const char *const *)names;
 
-- 
2.39.1