[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG_fn=UVa=x+idoHoHjfe+ASsT30aQGHLW3KkEgfmsOcwh_fQA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 16:18:56 +0100
From: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
Taras Madan <tarasmadan@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
"H . J . Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@....com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv15 06/17] x86/uaccess: Provide untagged_addr() and remove
tags before address check
> +#define untagged_addr_remote(mm, addr) ({ \
> + u64 __addr = (__force u64)(addr); \
> + mmap_assert_locked(mm); \
> + __addr = __untagged_addr(__addr, (mm)->context.untag_mask); \
> + (__force __typeof__(addr))__addr; \
> +})
> +
> +#else
> +#define untagged_addr(addr) (addr)
Could you please use tabs for indentation here?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists