lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 10 Feb 2023 10:47:53 -0500
From:   Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:     Prashanth K <quic_prashk@...cinc.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
        Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@...wei.com>,
        Pratham Pratap <quic_ppratap@...cinc.com>,
        Jack Pham <quic_jackp@...cinc.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: u_serial: Add null pointer check in
 gserial_resume

On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 12:26:52PM +0530, Prashanth K wrote:
> 
> 
> > And this seems like a viable option to me, what do you suggest?
> > 
> > gserial_disconnect {
> >      spin_lock(static)
> >      spin_lock(port)
> >      ...
> >      gser->ioport = NULL;
> >      ...
> >      spin_lock(port)
> >      spin_unlock(static)
> > 
> > }
> > 
> > gserial_resume {
> >      struct gs_port *port = gser->ioport;
> > 
> >      spin_lock(static)
> >      if (!port)
> 	   spin_unlock(static)
> >          return
> >      spin_lock(port)

If you want, you could move the spin_unlock(static) up to here.  It 
probably doesn't matter.

> > 
> >      ...
> >      spin_unlock(port)
> >      spin_unlock(static)
> > }

I agree, that should work fine.

Alan Stern

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ