linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Use mutex for ida_alloc() and ida

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 10 Feb 2023 17:21:27 +0100
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:     Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        markgross@...nel.org, david.e.box@...el.com
Cc:     platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Use mutex for ida_alloc() and
 ida_free()

Hi,

On 2/7/23 13:58, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> ID alloc and free functions don't have in built protection for parallel
> invocation of ida_alloc() and ida_free(). With the current flow in the
> vsec driver, there is no such scenario. But add mutex protection for
> potential future changes.
> 
> Suggested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>

Thank you for your patch, I've applied this patch to my review-hans 
branch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=review-hans

Note it will show up in my review-hans branch once I've pushed my
local branch there, which might take a while.

Once I've run some tests on this branch the patches there will be
added to the platform-drivers-x86/for-next branch and eventually
will be included in the pdx86 pull-request to Linus for the next
merge-window.

Regards,

Hans


> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel/vsec.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/vsec.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/vsec.c
> index b936fc5776d7..f1680b7e64f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/vsec.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/vsec.c
> @@ -129,11 +129,16 @@ static void intel_vsec_remove_aux(void *data)
>  	auxiliary_device_uninit(data);
>  }
>  
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(vsec_ida_lock);
> +
>  static void intel_vsec_dev_release(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct intel_vsec_device *intel_vsec_dev = dev_to_ivdev(dev);
>  
> +	mutex_lock(&vsec_ida_lock);
>  	ida_free(intel_vsec_dev->ida, intel_vsec_dev->auxdev.id);
> +	mutex_unlock(&vsec_ida_lock);
> +
>  	kfree(intel_vsec_dev->resource);
>  	kfree(intel_vsec_dev);
>  }
> @@ -145,7 +150,9 @@ int intel_vsec_add_aux(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct device *parent,
>  	struct auxiliary_device *auxdev = &intel_vsec_dev->auxdev;
>  	int ret, id;
>  
> +	mutex_lock(&vsec_ida_lock);
>  	ret = ida_alloc(intel_vsec_dev->ida, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	mutex_unlock(&vsec_ida_lock);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		kfree(intel_vsec_dev);
>  		return ret;
> @@ -161,7 +168,9 @@ int intel_vsec_add_aux(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct device *parent,
>  
>  	ret = auxiliary_device_init(auxdev);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
> +		mutex_lock(&vsec_ida_lock);
>  		ida_free(intel_vsec_dev->ida, auxdev->id);
> +		mutex_unlock(&vsec_ida_lock);
>  		kfree(intel_vsec_dev->resource);
>  		kfree(intel_vsec_dev);
>  		return ret;