linux-kernel - Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 3/4] lib/igt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 10 Feb 2023 13:55:34 -0300
From:   Isabella Basso <isabbasso@...eup.net>
To:     Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     igt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        Magali Lemes <magalilemes00@...il.com>,
        Maíra Canal <maira.canal@....br>,
        Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>, n@...aprado.net,
        kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        leandro.ribeiro@...labora.com,
        ML dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
        Tales Aparecida <tales.aparecida@...il.com>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        André Almeida <andrealmeid@...eup.net>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Trevor Woerner <twoerner@...il.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mauro.chehab@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 3/4] lib/igt_kmod: add compatibility
 for KUnit

Hi, Janusz,

> Am 2023-02-10 um 11:56 AM schrieb Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@...ux.intel.com>:
> 
> Hi Isabella,
> 
> On Monday, 19 September 2022 22:55:44 CET Isabella Basso wrote:
>> Hi, Janusz,
>> 
>>> Am 09/09/2022 um 12:18 PM schrieb Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@...ux.intel.com>:
>>> 
>>> ...
>>> 
>>> Anyway, related to my comment about naming that function a parser, I think the 
>>> best approach would be for that parser to return a generic set of results from 
>>> kunit execution, then we could feed that data into an IGT specific handler 
>>> that would convert them to IGT results (SUCCESS, FAIL, or SKIP) as if returned 
>>> by a set of IGT dynamic subtests.
>> 
>> That sounds like a good idea to me, I might take some extra time before v3 to
>> do that, though. 
> 
> Were you able to make any progress?  Do you need any help?

I’ve already handled most common cases but I still have to address Chehab’s comments — specifically in what concerns crashes. I’ve been doing most of the development by myself as GSoC has ended so I’m taking my time on this.

My most up-to-date work is available at [1], so if you have any suggestions as to what might be done I’d love to hear them before sending out v3 to the mailing list.

[1] - https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/isinyaaa/igt-gpu-tools/-/merge_requests/1

Cheers,
--
Isabella Basso

> Thanks,
> Janusz
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "KUnit Development" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kunit-dev+unsubscribe@...glegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kunit-dev/7621786.lvqk35OSZv%40jkrzyszt-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com.