lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aed35866-507c-870c-7e8a-c1868bcaa084@acm.org>
Date:   Sat, 11 Feb 2023 15:25:03 -0800
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>, Michael Reed <mdr@....com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Saurabh Singh Sengar <ssengar@...rosoft.com>,
        Praveen Kumar <kumarpraveen@...ux.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: qla1280: Replace arithmetic addition by bitwise OR

On 2/7/23 03:54, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> When adding two bit-field mask values, an OR operation offers higher
> performance over an arithmetic operation. So, convert such addition to
> an OR based expression.

Where is the evidence that supports this claim? On the following page I 
read that there is no performance difference when using a modern CPU: 
https://cs.stackexchange.com/questions/75811/why-is-addition-as-fast-as-bit-wise-operations-in-modern-processors

> Issue identified using orplus.cocci semantic patch script.

Where is that script located? Can it be deleted such that submission of 
patches similar to this patch stops?

Thanks,

Bart.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ