[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230212141355.12794-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2023 16:13:55 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpio: sim: Use %pfwP specifier instead of calling fwnode API directly
Instead of calling fwnode_get_name() and supply as %s, use %pfwP which
will do the same inside printf() call.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c
index 60514bc5454f..a51b5ea38ad5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c
@@ -377,8 +377,8 @@ static int gpio_sim_add_bank(struct fwnode_handle *swnode, struct device *dev)
ret = fwnode_property_read_string(swnode, "gpio-sim,label", &label);
if (ret) {
- label = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s-%s",
- dev_name(dev), fwnode_get_name(swnode));
+ label = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s-%pfwP",
+ dev_name(dev), swnode);
if (!label)
return -ENOMEM;
}
@@ -784,10 +784,9 @@ static int gpio_sim_add_hogs(struct gpio_sim_device *dev)
GFP_KERNEL);
else
hog->chip_label = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL,
- "gpio-sim.%u-%s",
+ "gpio-sim.%u-%pfwP",
dev->id,
- fwnode_get_name(
- bank->swnode));
+ bank->swnode);
if (!hog->chip_label) {
gpio_sim_remove_hogs(dev);
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.39.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists