[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+kBDQARCqIucrWi@spud>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2023 15:09:01 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
Christoph Muellner <christoph.muellner@...ll.eu>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...ll.eu>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] riscv: Fix alternatives issues on for-next
Hey Samuel,
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 08:15:31PM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
> Several people have reported that D1 fails to boot on linux-next.
> Patch 1 fixes a bug where early alternative patching used the wrong
> address. Patch 2 fixes a separate issue where the Zbb alternatives
> are incorrectly applied based on the 'C' extension instead of Zbb.
On Icicle, Nezha & VisionFive 2:
Tested-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
I was really curious why my CI didn't catch this, but I think boot
on Icicle wasn't broken as the toolchains pre-date Zbb and therefore it
isn't even compiled in.
And the VisionFive 2 doesn't care as it has Zbb.
Thanks for the fixes :)
Conor.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists