[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+kcgcncQO/2DNLo@spud>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2023 17:06:09 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: conor@...nel.org
Cc: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/13] riscv: improve boot time isa extensions handling
On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 04:33:58PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 03:59:59PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
So as not to lead anyone up the garden path, let me correct myself:
> Hmm, so this appears to be us attempting to patch in alternatives where
> none actually exists - seemingly F & D.
And of course that's not true, riscv_has_extension_likely() now uses
alternatives as of:
bdda5d554e43 ("riscv: introduce riscv_has_extension_[un]likely()")
From a quick look, it just happens that the only users are F & D.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists