linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 5/6] remoteproc: imx_rproc: set Cortex-M stack/pc to TCML

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230213180458.GB310433@p14s>
Date:   Mon, 13 Feb 2023 11:04:58 -0700
From:   Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To:     Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Cc:     "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>,
        "andersson@...nel.org" <andersson@...nel.org>,
        "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        "arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com" <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>,
        "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        "linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 5/6] remoteproc: imx_rproc: set Cortex-M stack/pc to
 TCML

On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 12:04:27AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 5/6] remoteproc: imx_rproc: set Cortex-M stack/pc
> > to TCML
> > 
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 05:22:45PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > >
> > > The i.MX8M Cortex-M core not has ROM. It has a requirement is the
> > > stack, pc value should be set in address 0 and 4 from the view of
> > > itself. From Cortex-A core view, the region is at TCML start address.
> > >
> > > The stack and pc value are the first two words stored in section
> > > ".interrupts" of the firmware, and the section is the first section in
> > > the firmware.
> > >
> > > When the firmware is built to run in TCML, there is no issue, because
> > > when copying elf segments, the first two words are copied to TCML also.
> > >
> > > However when the firmware is built ro run in DDR, the first two words
> > > are not copied to TCML start address.
> > >
> > > This patch is to find the ".interrupts" section, read out the first
> > > two words and write to TCML start address at offset 0 and 4.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 37
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > >  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > > b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c index 295e0e0e869a..f5ee0c9bb09d
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> > >  #include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
> > >  #include <linux/clk.h>
> > >  #include <linux/err.h>
> > > +#include <linux/firmware.h>
> > >  #include <linux/firmware/imx/sci.h>
> > >  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > >  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > > @@ -23,6 +24,7 @@
> > >  #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> > >
> > >  #include "imx_rproc.h"
> > > +#include "remoteproc_elf_helpers.h"
> > >  #include "remoteproc_internal.h"
> > >
> > >  #define IMX7D_SRC_SCR			0x0C
> > > @@ -634,6 +636,39 @@ static struct resource_table
> > *imx_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc
> > >  	return (struct resource_table __force *)priv->rsc_table;  }
> > >
> > > +static u64 imx_rproc_get_boot_addr(struct rproc *rproc, const struct
> > > +firmware *fw) {
> > > +	struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
> > > +	const u8 *elf_data = (void *)fw->data;
> > > +	u8 class = fw_elf_get_class(fw);
> > > +	u64 bootaddr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr(rproc, fw);
> > > +	const void *shdr;
> > > +	void __iomem *va;
> > > +	u64 sh_addr, offset;
> > > +
> > > +	if (priv->dcfg->devtype == IMX_RPROC_IMX8M) {
> > > +		/*
> > > +		 * i.MX8M Cortex-M requires [stack, pc] be put in address
> > > +		 * [0, 4], so the da address is 0, size is 8 words.
> > > +		 */
> > > +		va = (__force void __iomem *)rproc_da_to_va(rproc, 0, 8,
> > NULL);
> > > +		shdr = rproc_elf_find_shdr(rproc, fw, ".interrupts");
> > > +		if (!shdr || !va)
> > > +			return bootaddr;
> > > +		sh_addr = elf_shdr_get_sh_addr(class, shdr);
> > 
> > This isn't used - why is it still there?
> 
> will drop it.
> 
> > 
> > > +		offset = elf_shdr_get_sh_offset(class, shdr);
> > > +
> > > +		/*
> > > +		 * Write stack, pc to TCML start address. The TCML region
> > > +		 * is marked with ATT_IOMEM, so use writel.
> > > +		 */
> > > +		writel(*(u32 *)(elf_data + offset), va);
> > > +		writel(*(u32 *)(elf_data + offset + 4), va + 4);
> > 
> > Here you are writing 2 words at address 0x0 and 2 words at address 0x4.
> > Why are you saying the size is 8 words in the comment above?
> 
> Typo. I should mean 8 bytes.
>

How can I trust the code in this patchset when the "typo" is so obvious and
found in the comment above and 4 times in the changelog? 

> Thanks,
> Peng.
> 
> > 
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	return bootaddr;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static const struct rproc_ops imx_rproc_ops = {
> > >  	.prepare	= imx_rproc_prepare,
> > >  	.attach		= imx_rproc_attach,
> > > @@ -647,7 +682,7 @@ static const struct rproc_ops imx_rproc_ops = {
> > >  	.find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table,
> > >  	.get_loaded_rsc_table = imx_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table,
> > >  	.sanity_check	= rproc_elf_sanity_check,
> > > -	.get_boot_addr	= rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
> > > +	.get_boot_addr	= imx_rproc_get_boot_addr,
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  static int imx_rproc_addr_init(struct imx_rproc *priv,
> > > --
> > > 2.37.1
> > >