[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANDhNCqVcrZHGW4QJBD8_hZehmRpnNAsGFsmwsxBZNm3wpFZpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 11:37:37 -0800
From: John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>
To: kan.liang@...ux.intel.com
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sboyd@...nel.org, eranian@...gle.com,
namhyung@...nel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2 2/9] perf: Extend ABI to support post-processing
monotonic raw conversion
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 11:08 AM <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
>
> The monotonic raw clock is not affected by NTP/PTP correction. The
> calculation of the monotonic raw clock can be done in the
> post-processing, which can reduce the kernel overhead.
>
> Add hw_time in the struct perf_event_attr to tell the kernel dump the
> raw HW time to user space. The perf tool will calculate the HW time
> in post-processing.
> Currently, only supports the monotonic raw conversion.
> Only dump the raw HW time with PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE, because the accurate
> HW time can only be provided in a sample by HW. For other type of
> records, the user requested clock should be returned as usual. Nothing
> is changed.
>
> Add perf_event_mmap_page::cap_user_time_mono_raw ABI to dump the
> conversion information. The cap_user_time_mono_raw also indicates
> whether the monotonic raw conversion information is available.
> If yes, the clock monotonic raw can be calculated as
> mono_raw = base + ((cyc - last) * mult + nsec) >> shift
Again, I appreciate you reworking and resending this series out, I
know it took some effort.
But oof, I'd really like to make sure we're not exporting timekeeping
internals to userland.
I think Thomas' suggestion of doing the timestamp conversion in
post-processing was more about interpolating collected system times
with the counter (tsc) values captured.
I get the interpolation can be difficult as the counter value and
system time can't currently atomically collected, so potentially there
may be a need for a way to tie two together (see my previous email's
thought of ktime_get_raw_monotonic_from_timestamp()), but we'd
probably want a clear understanding of the benefit (quantitative
reduction in interpolation error, and what real benefit that brings),
and would also want the driver to generate and share those pairs
rather than having userland have access.
thanks
-john
Powered by blists - more mailing lists