[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <167631724833.4906.11237978689410775195.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 19:40:48 -0000
From: "irqchip-bot for Johan Hovold" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, #@...-bot2.tec.linutronix.de,
3.11@...-bot2.tec.linutronix.de,
"Hsin-Yi Wang" <hsinyi@...omium.org>,
"Mark-PK Tsai" <mark-pk.tsai@...iatek.com>,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [irqchip: irq/irqchip-next] irqdomain: Fix association race
The following commit has been merged into the irq/irqchip-next branch of irqchip:
Commit-ID: b06730a571a9ff1ba5bd6b20bf9e50e5a12f1ec6
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms/b06730a571a9ff1ba5bd6b20bf9e50e5a12f1ec6
Author: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
AuthorDate: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 11:42:43 +01:00
Committer: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
CommitterDate: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 19:31:24
irqdomain: Fix association race
The sanity check for an already mapped virq is done outside of the
irq_domain_mutex-protected section which means that an (unlikely) racing
association may not be detected.
Fix this by factoring out the association implementation, which will
also be used in a follow-on change to fix a shared-interrupt mapping
race.
Fixes: ddaf144c61da ("irqdomain: Refactor irq_domain_associate_many()")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 3.11
Tested-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
Tested-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@...iatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230213104302.17307-2-johan+linaro@kernel.org
---
kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
index 8fe1da9..6661de1 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
@@ -559,8 +559,8 @@ static void irq_domain_disassociate(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int irq)
irq_domain_clear_mapping(domain, hwirq);
}
-int irq_domain_associate(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
- irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
+static int irq_domain_associate_locked(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
{
struct irq_data *irq_data = irq_get_irq_data(virq);
int ret;
@@ -573,7 +573,6 @@ int irq_domain_associate(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
if (WARN(irq_data->domain, "error: virq%i is already associated", virq))
return -EINVAL;
- mutex_lock(&irq_domain_mutex);
irq_data->hwirq = hwirq;
irq_data->domain = domain;
if (domain->ops->map) {
@@ -590,7 +589,6 @@ int irq_domain_associate(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
}
irq_data->domain = NULL;
irq_data->hwirq = 0;
- mutex_unlock(&irq_domain_mutex);
return ret;
}
@@ -601,12 +599,23 @@ int irq_domain_associate(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
domain->mapcount++;
irq_domain_set_mapping(domain, hwirq, irq_data);
- mutex_unlock(&irq_domain_mutex);
irq_clear_status_flags(virq, IRQ_NOREQUEST);
return 0;
}
+
+int irq_domain_associate(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ mutex_lock(&irq_domain_mutex);
+ ret = irq_domain_associate_locked(domain, virq, hwirq);
+ mutex_unlock(&irq_domain_mutex);
+
+ return ret;
+}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_domain_associate);
void irq_domain_associate_many(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int irq_base,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists