[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b900238d-b06a-a9d7-6892-6a726603b63b@denx.de>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 21:59:27 +0100
From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Frieder Schrempf <frieder@...s.de>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>,
Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Heiko Thiery <heiko.thiery@...il.com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: dts: imx8mm-kontron: Add support for reading
SD_VSEL signal
On 2/13/23 20:56, Marco Felsch wrote:
> Hi Marek, Frieder,
Hi,
> On 23-02-13, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 2/13/23 17:15, Marco Felsch wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>> @@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ MX8MM_IOMUXC_SD2_DATA1_USDHC2_DATA1 0x1d6
>>>> MX8MM_IOMUXC_SD2_DATA2_USDHC2_DATA2 0x1d6
>>>> MX8MM_IOMUXC_SD2_DATA3_USDHC2_DATA3 0x1d6
>>>> MX8MM_IOMUXC_SD2_CD_B_GPIO2_IO12 0x019
>>>> - MX8MM_IOMUXC_GPIO1_IO04_USDHC2_VSELECT 0x1d0
>>>> + MX8MM_IOMUXC_GPIO1_IO04_USDHC2_VSELECT 0x400001d0
>>>
>>> The VSELECT pin should be driven by the (u)sdhc core...
>>>
>>>> >;
>>>> };
>>>> };
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-osm-s.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-osm-s.dtsi
>>>> index 5172883717d1..90daaf54e704 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-osm-s.dtsi
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-osm-s.dtsi
>>>> @@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ reg_nvcc_sd: LDO5 {
>>>> regulator-name = "NVCC_SD (LDO5)";
>>>> regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
>>>> regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
>>>> + sd-vsel-gpios = <&gpio1 4 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>>
>>> and by using the sd-vsel-gpios property the IOMUXC_GPIO1_IO04 have to be
>>> muxed as GPIO, which is not the case. So I think that u-boot have a bug
>>> within the (u)sdhc core.
>>
>> The trick here is that the VSELECT is operated by the usdhc block as a
>> function pin, but the PMIC driver can read the current state of the VSELECT
>> pin by reading out the GPIO block SR register. Since the IOMUX SION bit is
>> set on the VSELECT pin, the state of the pin is reflected in the GPIO block
>> SR register even if the pin is muxed as function pin.
>>
>
> Thanks for this explanation :) Why does the regulator driver need to
> know the current state of this pin?
Because that regulator has an input pin which selects between two states
of that regulator, L and H, and whatever L or H is depends on what is
configured into the regulator via I2C. To correctly report the state of
the regulator, you have to know the state of that input (selector) pin.
> Since the voltage switching requires
> some cmd's before the actual voltage level switch. So this must be
> handled within the core.
>
> Also after checking the driver, adding the sd-vsel-gpios will request
> the specified gpio as output-high.
The GPIO would have to be requested as input, obviously.
> Out of curiosity, what's the bug you
> triggering within U-Boot?
AFAICT the readback of the initial state of the regulator (see paragraph
above), which affects Linux all the same.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists