[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6a7d93a51d19e0cec28b2169d1ab0262148ff717.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 18:06:36 +1100
From: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc: ruscur@...sell.cc, bgray@...ux.ibm.com, nayna@...ux.ibm.com,
gcwilson@...ux.ibm.com, gjoyce@...ux.ibm.com, brking@...ux.ibm.com,
sudhakar@...ux.ibm.com, erichte@...ux.ibm.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
zohar@...ux.ibm.com, joel@....id.au, npiggin@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 24/26] powerpc/pseries: Implement secvars for dynamic
secure boot
On Fri, 2023-02-10 at 16:23 -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > + memcpy(&flags, data, sizeof(flags));
>
> conversion from bytestream to integer: I think in this case it would
> be better to use
>
> flags = cpu_to_be64p((__u64*)data);
>
> so that the flags always in hypervisor/big endian format
Thanks for catching this - it turns out we weren't properly testing the
one flag that exists (append vs replace) in our test script, so I
didn't notice this.
--
Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL Canberra
ajd@...ux.ibm.com IBM Australia Limited
Powered by blists - more mailing lists