[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eec940a49f4f9ec9e5bd7ad763e436d34b42be22.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 08:22:33 +0000
From: Chunfeng Yun (云春峰)
<Chunfeng.Yun@...iatek.com>
To: "vkoul@...nel.org" <vkoul@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eddie Hung (洪正鑫)
<Eddie.Hung@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] phy: mediatek: tphy: add debugfs files
On Mon, 2023-02-13 at 16:21 +0800, chunfeng yun wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-02-10 at 21:01 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On 10-02-23, 16:58, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> > > These debugfs files are mainly used to make eye diagram test
> > > easier,
> > > especially helpful to do HQA test for a new IC without efuse
> > > enabled.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>
> > > ---
> > > v8: abandon patch to create phy debug root file
> > > /sys/kernel/debug/phy/ suggested by Vinod
> >
> > Sorry that was not my suggestion
>
> Sorry, I misunderstood you means
> >
> > >
> > > v6~v7: no changes
> > >
> > > v5: using common debugfs config CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> > >
> > > v4: fix build warning of sometimes uninitialized variable
> > >
> > > v3: fix typo of "debugfs" suggested by AngeloGioacchino
> > >
> > > v2: add CONFIG_PHY_MTK_TPHY_DEBUGFS suggested by AngeloGioacchino
> > > ---
> > > drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-tphy.c | 405
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 404 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-tphy.c
> > > b/drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-tphy.c
> > > index e906a82791bd..65a95c3726bf 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-tphy.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-tphy.c
> > > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> > >
> > > #include <dt-bindings/phy/phy.h>
> > > #include <linux/clk.h>
> > > +#include <linux/debugfs.h>
> > > #include <linux/delay.h>
> > > #include <linux/iopoll.h>
> > > #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> > > @@ -264,6 +265,8 @@
> > >
> > > #define TPHY_CLKS_CNT 2
> > >
> > > +#define USER_BUF_LEN(count) min_t(size_t, 8, (count))
> > > +
> > > enum mtk_phy_version {
> > > MTK_PHY_V1 = 1,
> > > MTK_PHY_V2,
> > > @@ -310,6 +313,7 @@ struct mtk_phy_instance {
> > > struct clk_bulk_data clks[TPHY_CLKS_CNT];
> > > u32 index;
> > > u32 type;
> > > + struct dentry *dbgfs;
> > > struct regmap *type_sw;
> > > u32 type_sw_reg;
> > > u32 type_sw_index;
> > > @@ -332,10 +336,391 @@ struct mtk_tphy {
> > > const struct mtk_phy_pdata *pdata;
> > > struct mtk_phy_instance **phys;
> > > int nphys;
> > > + struct dentry *dbgfs_root;
> > > int src_ref_clk; /* MHZ, reference clock for slew rate
> > > calibrate */
> > > int src_coef; /* coefficient for slew rate calibrate */
> > > };
> >
> > I asked the struct dentry *debugfs be part of struct phy. Debugfs
> > would
> > be created by core but rather than exported, it should be populated
> > in
> > phy and you can use it here in the driver
> >
> > >
>
> Ok, I'll do the following steps:
>
> 0. put a struct dentry *debugfs in struct phy;
> 1. define a static struct dentry *phy_debugfs_root in phy-core.c,
> then
> create a root directory (/sys/kernel/debug/phy/) for phy
> subsystem
> in phy_core_init();
> 2. create directory for each phy under the root directory
> (/sys/kernel/debug/phy/);
> this step has two ways:
> A: create the directory @debugfs of struct phy in phy_create() by
> default;
> B: provide some api for user to create/destory the directory
> @debugfs or others when need;
> 3. add private debugfs files in @debugfs of struct phy;
>
> For the case in tphy driver, it provides some struct phy, the driver
> may want to create debugfs files which not belongs to any struct phy
> in
> the root directory (/sys/kernel/debug/phy/), then need provide a api.
>
> Do you have any suggestions?
> Which way do you prefer to use in step 2?
>
> Thanks a lot;
>
> > <skip>
> > > +
> > > static struct platform_driver mtk_tphy_driver = {
> > > .probe = mtk_tphy_probe,
> > > + .remove = mtk_tphy_remove,
> > > .driver = {
> > > .name = "mtk-tphy",
> > > .of_match_table = mtk_tphy_id_table,
> > > --
> > > 2.18.0
> >
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists