[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <36c2bc37-714b-2251-942f-1d02f4b77d5a@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 17:35:47 +0800
From: Guorui Yu <GuoRui.Yu@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, hch@....de,
m.szyprowski@...sung.com
Cc: llvm@...ts.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
robin.murphy@....com, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xiaokang.hxk@...baba-inc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] swiotlb: fix the deadlock in swiotlb_do_find_slots
在 2023/2/13 17:28, kernel test robot 写道:
> Hi GuoRui.Yu",
>
> Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
>
> 654 spin_lock_irqsave(&area->lock, flags);
> 655 if (unlikely(nslots > mem->area_nslabs - area->used))
> 656 goto not_found;
> 657
> 658 slot_base = area_index * mem->area_nslabs;
> 659 index = wrap = wrap_area_index(mem, ALIGN(area->index, stride));
index_nowrap should be initialized to "index" here, and I will add this
in v2.
I have done some stress tests locally to check if they can avoid the
deadlock but they did not reveal this problem, I will pay more attention
next time.
> 660
> 661 do {
Guorui
Powered by blists - more mailing lists