[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB5276071461BC318B76A379348CDD9@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 01:54:15 +0000
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"jgg@...dia.com" <jgg@...dia.com>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>
CC: "cohuck@...hat.com" <cohuck@...hat.com>,
"eric.auger@...hat.com" <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
"nicolinc@...dia.com" <nicolinc@...dia.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com" <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
"chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com" <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>,
"yi.y.sun@...ux.intel.com" <yi.y.sun@...ux.intel.com>,
"peterx@...hat.com" <peterx@...hat.com>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com"
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
"lulu@...hat.com" <lulu@...hat.com>,
"suravee.suthikulpanit@....com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
"iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/6] iommu: Add new iommu op to get iommu hardware
information
> From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2023 11:43 AM
>
> On 2023/2/10 15:28, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> >> From: Liu, Yi L<yi.l.liu@...el.com>
> >> Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2023 12:17 PM
> >> @@ -223,6 +224,11 @@ struct iommu_iotlb_gather {
> >> /**
> >> * struct iommu_ops - iommu ops and capabilities
> >> * @capable: check capability
> >> + * @hw_info: IOMMU hardware capabilities. The type of the returned
> data
> >> is
> > is it 'info' or 'capability'?
>
> hw_info. IOMMU core does not care about specific content, so it is not
> necessary to define it as capability or anything else.
>
> Perhaps we need to change the comments a bit, say, "IOMMU hardware
> information"?
>
yes, that is probably more consistent.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists