[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <616c7fab-65ad-17b7-f360-94b7e22f892@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 12:00:52 +0200 (EET)
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...fujitsu.com>
cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/6] selftests/resctrl: Cleanup properly when an error
occurs in CAT test
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023, Shaopeng Tan wrote:
> After creating a child process with fork() in CAT test, if an error
> occurs when parent process runs cat_val() or check_results(), the child
I'd replace the rest of the paragraph with this:
"returns early. The parent will wait pipe message from child which will
never be sent by the child and the parent cannot proceeed to unmount
resctrlfs."
> process will not be killed and also resctrlfs is not unmounted. Also if
> an error occurs when child process runs cat_val() or check_results(),
> the child process is returned, but the parent process will wait pipe
> message from child.
>
> Synchronize the exits between the parent and child. An error occurs
> whether in parents process or child process, the parents process
> always kills child process and runs umount_resctrlfs(), and the
> child process always waits to be killed by the parent process.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
> index 6a8306b0a109..477b62dac546 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
> @@ -186,23 +186,20 @@ int cat_perf_miss_val(int cpu_no, int n, char *cache_type)
> remove(param.filename);
>
> ret = cat_val(¶m);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> - ret = check_results(¶m);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + if (ret == 0)
> + ret = check_results(¶m);
>
> if (bm_pid == 0) {
> /* Tell parent that child is ready */
> close(pipefd[0]);
> pipe_message = 1;
> if (write(pipefd[1], &pipe_message, sizeof(pipe_message)) <
> - sizeof(pipe_message)) {
> - close(pipefd[1]);
> + sizeof(pipe_message))
> + /*
> + * Just print the error message.
> + * Let while(1) run and wait for itself to be killed.
> + */
> perror("# failed signaling parent process");
> - return errno;
> - }
>
> close(pipefd[1]);
> while (1)
> @@ -226,5 +223,5 @@ int cat_perf_miss_val(int cpu_no, int n, char *cache_type)
> if (bm_pid)
> umount_resctrlfs();
>
> - return 0;
> + return ret;
> }
>
The code change looks good.
--
i.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists