linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: leds-lp55xx: add ti,charge-pump-mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 13 Feb 2023 11:22:06 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Maarten Zanders <maarten.zanders@...d.be>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: leds-lp55xx: add ti,charge-pump-mode

On 13/02/2023 11:20, Maarten Zanders wrote:
> Add a binding to configure the internal charge pump for lp55xx.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Zanders <maarten.zanders@...d.be>
> ---
> 
> Notes:
>     v1: implement as bool to disable charge pump
>     v2: rewrite to use string configuration, supporting all modes
>     v3: simplification by replacing string option by u8 constant,
>         removing previous Reviewed-by tags as it's a complete
>         rewrite of the patch.
>     v4: added notes
>     v5: dual license, change property type to u32

Thank you for your patch. There is something to discuss/improve.


> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/leds/leds-lp55xx.h b/include/dt-bindings/leds/leds-lp55xx.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..e2256312714b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/leds/leds-lp55xx.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR MIT) */

While technically it is almost equal to BSD-2, any particular reason for
using different second license than the binding and generic
recommendation (checkpatch)?

Best regards,
Krzysztof