[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB9PR10MB5881C08001D7FA76D6E2C06CE0DD9@DB9PR10MB5881.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 11:32:47 +0000
From: "Starke, Daniel" <daniel.starke@...mens.com>
To: "m.brock@...mierlo.com" <m.brock@...mierlo.com>
CC: "linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"jirislaby@...nel.org" <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
"ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com" <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 1/1] tty: n_gsm: add keep alive support
> > From: Daniel Starke <daniel.starke@...mens.com>
> > + u32 keep_alive; /* Control channel keep-alive in ms */
> [...]
> > + if (dlci && !dlci->dead)
> > + mod_timer(&gsm->ka_timer, jiffies + gsm->keep_alive * HZ / 100);
>
> keep-alive is in ms? or in 10ms?
Good found. The comment is wrong. It is in 10ms as also written in the
comment for "keep_alive" within gsmmux.h to be in line with t1 and t2.
I will correct this for v6 of the patch.
Best regards,
Daniel Starke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists