[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BL1PR11MB52710ED111526C1CC580273E8CDD9@BL1PR11MB5271.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 02:52:52 +0000
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>,
"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@....com>
CC: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/2] Remove VT-d virtual command interface
> From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
> Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2023 7:02 AM
>
> Hi all,
>
> This patch set removes unused VT-d virtual command interface followed by
> clean up in the IOASID code.
>
> This has only been tested on x86 platforms, need help with testing on ARM
> SMMU and other architectures.
>
> I also hope to collect feedback on the upcoming clean up and enhancements
> below:
> 1. Consolidate VT-d private SVA PASID array with IOASID common code
> 2. As we retain the global IOASID allocator, we need some level of resource
> management. I want to restart the effort to include IOASID under misc
> cgroup.
> (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20210303160205.151d114e@jacob-
> builder/)
>
this should go with adding global pasid allocator to iommufd.
before that we don't have such cgroup requirement.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists