lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8b8f61ea-8419-c4b5-0434-276d13fe3e39@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 13 Feb 2023 14:35:29 +0200
From:   Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, andersson@...nel.org,
        agross@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org
Cc:     marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
        Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>,
        Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Vladimir Lypak <vladimir.lypak@...il.com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] drm/msm/dsi: Fix DSI index detection when version
 clash occurs

On 13/02/2023 14:10, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> Currently, we allow for MAX_DSI entries in io_start to facilitate for
> MAX_DSI number of DSI hosts at different addresses. The configuration
> is matched against the DSI CTRL hardware revision read back from the
> component. We need a way to resolve situations where multiple SoCs
> with different register maps may use the same version of DSI CTRL. In
> preparation to do so, make msm_dsi_config a 2d array where each entry
> represents a set of configurations adequate for a given SoC.
> 
> This is totally fine to do, as the only differentiating factors
> between same-version-different-SoCs configurations are the number of
> DSI hosts (1 or 2, at least as of today) and the set of base registers.
> The regulator setup is the same, because the DSI hardware is the same,
> regardless of the SoC it was implemented in.
> 
> In addition to that, update the matching logic such that it will loop
> over VARIANTS_MAX variants, making sure they are all taken into account.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.c  | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.h  |  5 ++-
>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c | 10 +++---
>   3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ