Message-ID: <PA4PR04MB752097BD63A2151DC5658D4688DD9@PA4PR04MB7520.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Feb 2023 12:41:14 +0000
From:   Cyrille Fleury <cyrille.fleury@....com>
To:     Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
CC:     Jerome Forissier <jerome.forissier@...aro.org>,
        Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@...aro.org>,
        Olivier Masse <olivier.masse@....com>,
        "sumit.garg@...aro.org" <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
        "linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        "fredgc@...gle.com" <fredgc@...gle.com>,
        "linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org>,
        "afd@...com" <afd@...com>,
        "op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org" <op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org>,
        "joakim.bech@...aro.org" <joakim.bech@...aro.org>,
        "sumit.semwal@...aro.org" <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Clément Faure <clement.faure@....com>,
        "christian.koenig@....com" <christian.koenig@....com>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] tee: new ioctl to a register tee_shm
 from a dmabuf file descriptor

Hi,

>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jerome Forissier <jerome.forissier@...aro.org>
>> Sent: Friday, February 3, 2023 1:32 PM
>> To: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@...aro.org>; Olivier Masse 
>> <olivier.masse@....com>
>> Cc: sumit.garg@...aro.org; linux-media@...r.kernel.org; 
>> fredgc@...gle.com; linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org; afd@...com; 
>> op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org; jens.wiklander@...aro.org; 
>> joakim.bech@...aro.org; sumit.semwal@...aro.org; Cyrille Fleury 
>> <cyrille.fleury@....com>; Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>; 
>> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org; Clément 
>> Faure <clement.faure@....com>; christian.koenig@....com
>> Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] tee: new ioctl to a register 
>> tee_shm from a dmabuf file descriptor
>>
>> On 2/3/23 15:12, Cyrille Fleury wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> >On 2/3/23 12:37, Etienne Carriere wrote:
>> >> Hell all,
>> >>
>> >> +jerome f.
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 at 12:01, Olivier Masse <olivier.masse@....com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> On jeu., 2023-02-02 at 10:58 +0100, Etienne Carriere wrote:
>> >>>> Caution: EXT Email
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 at 09:35, Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>> Hi Cyrille,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Please don't top post as it makes it harder to follow-up.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 at 13:26, Cyrille Fleury 
>> >>>>> <cyrille.fleury@....com
>> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>> Hi Sumit, all
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Upstream OP-TEE should support registering a dmabuf since a 
>> >>>>>> while, given how widely dmabuf is used in Linux for passing 
>> >>>>>> buffers around between devices.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Purpose of the new register_tee_shm ioctl is to allow OPTEE to 
>> >>>>>> use memory allocated from the exiting linux dma buffer. We 
>> >>>>>> don't need to have secure dma-heap up streamed.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> You mentioned secure dma-buffer, but secure dma-buffer is a 
>> >>>>>> dma- buffer, so the work to be done for secure or "regular" dma 
>> >>>>>> buffers by the register_tee_shm ioctl is 100% the same.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> The scope of this ioctl is limited to what existing upstream 
>> >>>>>> dma- buffers are:
>> >>>>>>         -> sharing buffers for hardware (DMA) access across 
>> >>>>>> multiple device drivers and subsystems, and for synchronizing 
>> >>>>>> asynchronous hardware access.
>> >>>>>>        -> It means continuous memory only.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> So if we reduce the scope of register tee_shm to exiting dma- 
>> >>>>>> buffer area, the current patch does the job.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Do you have a corresponding real world use-case supported by 
>> >>>>> upstream OP-TEE? AFAIK, the Secure Data Path (SDP) use-case is 
>> >>>>> the one supported in OP-TEE upstream but without secure dmabuf 
>> >>>>> heap [1] available, the new ioctl can't be exercised.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> [1]
>> >>>>> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%
>> >>>>> 2Fg%2F&data=05%7C01%7Ccyrille.fleury%40nxp.com%7C057d956d144a41e
>> >>>>> dd81808db0db1c7f9%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C6
>> >>>>> 38118829451030288%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLC
>> >>>>> JQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sda
>> >>>>> ta=tBh3qNiinzTn%2BgqE8IvGw%2BYvRvo8ztDt4W4O0noEkk8%3D&reserved=0
>> >>>>> ithub.com%2FOP-TEE%2Foptee_test%2Fblob%2Fmaster%2Fhost%2Fxtest%2
>> >>>>> Fsd
>> >>>>> p_basic.h%23L15&data=05%7C01%7Ccyrille.fleury%40nxp.com%7C9ff962
>> >>>>> fb5 
>> >>>>> 8f6401c597808db05e2a64b%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7
>> >>>>> C0% 
>> >>>>> 7C638110243232457377%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDA
>> >>>>> iLC 
>> >>>>> JQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sda
>> >>>>> ta=
>> >>>>> UNB88rvmhQ5qRoIGN%2FpS4cQTES5joM8AjoyAAYzPKl0%3D&reserved=0
>> >>>>
>> >>>> OP-TEE has some SDP test taht can exercice SDP: 'xtest 
>> >>>> regression_1014'.
>> >>>> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2
>> >>>> Fgi%2F&data=05%7C01%7Ccyrille.fleury%40nxp.com%7C057d956d144a41ed
>> >>>> d81808db0db1c7f9%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C638
>> >>>> 118829451030288%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQI
>> >>>> joiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%
>> >>>> 2FDGLzwTOc5%2F30%2BLy4bBVckK0fRJRsvuGcUvp6bfW9Tg%3D&reserved=0
>> >>>> thub.com%2FOP-TEE%2Foptee_test%2Fblob%2F3.20.0%2Fhost%2Fxtest%2Fr
>> >>>> egr
>> >>>> ession_1000.c%23L1256&data=05%7C01%7Ccyrille.fleury%40nxp.com%7C9
>> >>>> ff9 
>> >>>> 62fb58f6401c597808db05e2a64b%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7
>> >>>> C0% 
>> >>>> 7C0%7C638110243232457377%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAw
>> >>>> MDA 
>> >>>> iLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&s
>> >>>> dat
>> >>>> a=e%2B40rwWvtvVFG8aWZNeu%2FgjMXXvZ3pRhJfHLkdurovs%3D&reserved=0
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The test relies on old staged ION + local secure dmabuf heaps no 
>> >>>> more maintained, so this test is currently not functional.
>> >>>> If we upgrade the test to mainline dmabuf alloc means, and apply 
>> >>>> the change discussed here, we should be able to regularly test 
>> >>>> SDP in OP-TEE project CI.
>> >>>> The part to update is the userland allocation of the dmabuf:
>> >>>> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2
>> >>>> Fgi%2F&data=05%7C01%7Ccyrille.fleury%40nxp.com%7C057d956d144a41ed
>> >>>> d81808db0db1c7f9%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C638
>> >>>> 118829451030288%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQI
>> >>>> joiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%
>> >>>> 2FDGLzwTOc5%2F30%2BLy4bBVckK0fRJRsvuGcUvp6bfW9Tg%3D&reserved=0
>> >>>> thub.com%2FOP-TEE%2Foptee_test%2Fblob%2F3.20.0%2Fhost%2Fxtest%2Fs
>> >>>> dp_
>> >>>> basic.c%23L91&data=05%7C01%7Ccyrille.fleury%40nxp.com%7C9ff962fb5
>> >>>> 8f6
>> >>>> 401c597808db05e2a64b%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7
>> >>>> C63 
>> >>>> 8110243232457377%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQ
>> >>>> Ijo 
>> >>>> iV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=5rP
>> >>>> V1j
>> >>>> qzqjVh2N5pdUW41YwF6EkgIDwfhyfYkgmtdZI%3D&reserved=0
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> the test was already updated to support secure dma heap with 
>> >>> Kernel version 5.11 and higher. the userland allocation could be find here:
>> >>> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
>> >>> git%2F&data=05%7C01%7Ccyrille.fleury%40nxp.com%7C057d956d144a41edd
>> >>> 81808db0db1c7f9%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C63811
>> >>> 8829451030288%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoi
>> >>> V2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=dUNus
>> >>> R9w0TlzTRiqUUhU8yo%2BUF7QPhsx5t8GQuAA1SU%3D&reserved=0
>> >>> hub.com%2FOP-TEE%2Foptee_test%2Fblob%2F3.20.0%2Fhost%2Fxtest%2Fsdp
>> >>> _ba
>> >>> sic.c%23L153&data=05%7C01%7Ccyrille.fleury%40nxp.com%7C9ff962fb58f
>> >>> 640
>> >>> 1c597808db05e2a64b%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C63
>> >>> 811 
>> >>> 0243232457377%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoi
>> >>> V2l 
>> >>> uMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=01H96n47
>> >>> K6R
>> >>> mBKZQhRdcqX3nE5VBHOXNfGuMmmkVSvc%3D&reserved=0
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> Oh, right. So fine, optee_test is ready for the new flavor of 
>> >> secure buffer fd's.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> This upgrade need a Linux dma-buf patch:
>> >>> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
>> >>> lor%2F&data=05%7C01%7Ccyrille.fleury%40nxp.com%7C057d956d144a41edd
>> >>> 81808db0db1c7f9%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C63811
>> >>> 8829451030288%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoi
>> >>> V2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=4iomH
>> >>> K4kPt6A4OmyioiIFD360bGh39o0d2%2BJGyI3WYM%3D&reserved=0
>> >>> e.kernel.org%2Fall%2F20220805154139.2qkqxwklufjpsfdx%4000037740335
>> >>> 3%2
>> >>> FT%2F&data=05%7C01%7Ccyrille.fleury%40nxp.com%7C9ff962fb58f6401c59
>> >>> 780
>> >>> 8db05e2a64b%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C638110243
>> >>> 232 
>> >>> 457377%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzI
>> >>> iLC 
>> >>> JBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=yCS%2BDcuGp%2Ba
>> >>> fAL
>> >>> tpw74O1bI0K%2Fwnt%2FOw5ob1ngfDA0E%3D&reserved=0
>> >>
>> >> @Jens, @Jerome, do we want to pick the 2 necessary Linux patches in 
>> >> our Linux kernel fork (github.com/linaro-swg/linux.git) to exercise 
>> >> SDP in our CI and be ready if dma-buf secure heaps (ref right 
>> >> above) is accepted and merged in mainline kernel?.
>> >
>> >How would that help? I mean, when the kernel patches are merged and 
>> >if things break we can make the necessary adjustments in the 
>> >optee_test app or whatever, but in the meantime I don't see much 
>> >point. I suppose the people who are actively developing the patches 
>> >do make sure it works with OP-TEE ;-)
>> >
>> >Regards,
>> >--
>> >Jerome
>>
>> As mentioned in the cover letter, this IOCTL got tested by Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>, using Linaro reference board from Hikey 6620:
>> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flist
>> s.trustedfirmware.org%2Farchives%2Flist%2Fop-tee%40lists.trustedfirmwa
>> re.org%2Fthread%2FI3TZN4TBDOUVE567VMMN2TAXGWZNY7S3%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cc
>> yrille.fleury%40nxp.com%7C057d956d144a41edd81808db0db1c7f9%7C686ea1d3b
>> c2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C638118829451030288%7CUnknown%7CTWFpb
>> GZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0
>> %3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EHEVIdfHacDVq%2BCdSYg0Tkm1ekQLEI6Vra4elN0%2F
>> %2F6I%3D&reserved=0
>> It also works on i.MX8M EVK boards.
>>
>> My understanding today is we are good to upstream this patch, knowing:
>>      - Upstream OPTEE driver should support registering a dmabuf since a while, given how widely dmabuf is used in Linux for passing buffers around between devices.
>>      - review is OK
>>      - test environment is already available in optee-test
>>      - it has been tested on 2 different platforms
>>      - the scope of the new ioctl is limited to existing feature in 
>> dma-buffer
>>
>> What is missing from this list preventing to upstream ?
>
>Please address the comments from Etienne and post a new version of the patch based on the latest kernel. Please try to improve the language in the commit message.
>
>Is it possible to update the tests so this can be tested on QEMU in our CI loop? That should help to get the review restarted.
>
>Thanks,
>Jens
>

Hi Jens
 Could you point the Etienne comment(s) not addressed by the pull request to add register tee_shm ioctl to linux optee-driver? 
  Last comments from Etienne:
        -> Oh, right. So fine, optee_test is ready for the new flavor of secure buffer fd's.
        -> @Jens, @Jerome, do we want to pick the 2 necessary Linux patches in our Linux kernel fork (github.com/linaro-swg/linux.git) to exercise SDP in our CI and be ready if dma-buf secure heaps (ref right above) is accepted and merged in mainline kernel?.

Regards.
Cyrille.


>> Who do we still need to convince ?
>>
>> Regards.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists